<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PHP SPL Data Structures Benchmark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://developer.studivz.net/2009/03/18/php-spl-data-structures-benchmark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://developer.studivz.net/2009/03/18/php-spl-data-structures-benchmark/</link>
	<description>where the VZ developers blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:18:44 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://developer.studivz.net/2009/03/18/php-spl-data-structures-benchmark/comment-page-1/#comment-520</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 23:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://developer.studivz.net/?p=942#comment-520</guid>
		<description>Ive also performed some benchmarks on SPLFixedArray - I found reading to be faster but the sizeof and count functions to be significantly slower.

Memory usage was also significantly reduced when using SPLFixedArray vs a normal array.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ive also performed some benchmarks on SPLFixedArray &#8211; I found reading to be faster but the sizeof and count functions to be significantly slower.</p>
<p>Memory usage was also significantly reduced when using SPLFixedArray vs a normal array.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ingo Schramm</title>
		<link>http://developer.studivz.net/2009/03/18/php-spl-data-structures-benchmark/comment-page-1/#comment-446</link>
		<dc:creator>Ingo Schramm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://developer.studivz.net/?p=942#comment-446</guid>
		<description>Elsewhere I wrote a short appendix to this blog post covering the behavior of array_shift().

http://www.ingo-schramm.de/blog/archives/9-PHP-array_shift-does-not-scale.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elsewhere I wrote a short appendix to this blog post covering the behavior of array_shift().</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ingo-schramm.de/blog/archives/9-PHP-array_shift-does-not-scale.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ingo-schramm.de/blog/archives/9-PHP-array_shift-does-not-scale.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PHP array_shift() does not scale - ingo() -&#62; tech. % Tech Blog of Ingo Schramm</title>
		<link>http://developer.studivz.net/2009/03/18/php-spl-data-structures-benchmark/comment-page-1/#comment-445</link>
		<dc:creator>PHP array_shift() does not scale - ingo() -&#62; tech. % Tech Blog of Ingo Schramm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://developer.studivz.net/?p=942#comment-445</guid>
		<description>[...] operation for each shift.    This blog post is an appendix to another blog post I wrote about benchmarking SPL data structures.     Posted by Ingo in PHP, Scalability at 11:39 &#124; Comments (0) &#124; Trackbacks (0)       Trackbacks  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] operation for each shift.    This blog post is an appendix to another blog post I wrote about benchmarking SPL data structures.     Posted by Ingo in PHP, Scalability at 11:39 | Comments (0) | Trackbacks (0)       Trackbacks  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
